If the world is against truth, I am against the world
I recently saw that quote, and it struck me immediately.
If the world is against truth, I am against the world so I stand by my convictions.
The “powers that be” in our world are often opposed to Truth. And by Truth, I mean something fairly simple: what God has said is true.
When I speak of “the world” here, I am not talking about every person in it. I mean the cultural system that seeks to shape how people think, what they value, and ultimately what they believe. It exercises influence through the institutions that shape culture. The vision it promotes is contrary to God’s Truth.
The world asserts itself almost everywhere. We see its influence among the news media, in universities, entertainment, secular intellectual class, and social media. When the same ideas are repeated across these institutions, they can create the appearance of an overwhelming cultural consensus—even when that consensus may not be nearly as universal as it appears. “Woke” and “wokeness” have become common labels for some of these cultural forces.
The Power to Shape What We Believe
Our personal reach has been limited by our individual spheres of influence. Famous people have a wider reach than the rest of us, but everyone has influence.
Social media changed the equation. Algorithms now play an enormous role in determining what people see, what becomes popular, and even which ideas appear socially acceptable. Repeat a message often enough, amplify it broadly enough, and eventually it can begin to feel no longer like an opinion, but like reality itself.
The hope of the world seems to be that, with enough repetition and cultural pressure, people will eventually accept its vision of reality. We will be trained to see things its way.
And it has been working.
When the Unthinkable Becomes Normal
Consider abortion.
There was a time when intentionally ending the life of an unborn child was widely regarded not simply as unfortunate, but as morally wrong. Today, abortion is increasingly described not only as a right but, in mainstream cultural circles, as something to be celebrated as an expression of freedom and autonomy. Opposition to abortion is often portayed as the ultimate oppression of women.
The path to that point did not begin with celebration. Much of the early argument appealed to compassion for women in desperate circumstances. Stories of women attempting dangerous abortions on themselves, sometimes with wire coat hangers, were horrifying—and rightly evoked compassion.
But compassion for a desperate person and the morality of an act are two different questions.
Instead of maintaining that distinction, society gradually changed its judgment about the act itself. What was first defended as something that should be legally available in tragic circumstances increasingly became something regarded as morally acceptable, then a fundamental right, and finally, a test of whether a person holds the culturally approved view.
That progression should cause us to ask an important question: If a culture repeats a moral claim long enough, does that make the claim true?
I do not believe it does.
Compassion Cannot Be Our Only Moral Standard
Abortion is not the only example. Our culture increasingly embraces a philosophy that places individual autonomy above almost every competing consideration.
Today, people I have known—and still love—sometimes describe the enforcement of laws once considered reasonable and just as somehow unchristian. Compassion for the individual can become the overriding moral principle, even when legitimate questions about justice, responsibility, order, and the good of society remain.
Compassion matters deeply. Christians should be compassionate because Christ was compassionate.
But compassion cannot mean simply affirming whatever another person wants. Love sometimes comforts. Love sometimes sacrifices. And love sometimes tells the truth when the truth is difficult to hear.
The question cannot merely be, “What feels compassionate?”
The deeper question must be, “What is true, and what does God say is good?”
I Could Be Wrong
There is another danger here, though, and Christians should take it seriously.
I could be wrong.
I am open to having my own views corrected. In fact, I consider that a personal intellectual obligation. I must remain teachable. Pride can deceive a Christian just as surely as culture can deceive anyone else.
But I do not trust the world to be the final authority that corrects me.
I trust God’s Word.
In Ephesians 4:1-3 (ESV), Paul said “I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge you to walk worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.”
I trust the Holy Spirit to teach, convict, and correct me. His correction can come from something I read, a discussion with someone or some new insight. And I trust Him to do the same for those who believe some of my views are unchristian. God loves all of us and desires what is good for us. Yet He does not seem to be in a hurry to bring human beings to a complete understanding of His perspective.
That realization should make us humble.
It should also drive us back to Scripture.
Biblical Truth in Modern Culture: A Spiritual Battle
We should not misunderstand what is happening around us. Scripture describes a spiritual conflict between good and evil, truth and deception.
The cultural fog can become so dense that distinguishing between the two becomes increasingly difficult. And that should not make me more arrogant or more certain of my own wisdom. It should make me humbler and more dependent upon God’s Word.
The Christian’s enemy is not the person who disagrees with us. We are called to love people—even those who oppose everything we believe.
In Ephesians 6:12 (NKJV), Paul writes “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”
But loving the world and conforming ourselves to the world’s values are not the same thing.
The world, as Scripture uses that term, is a system in rebellion against God. Christians should expect that its values will sometimes collide directly with God’s truth.
Someday, that rebellion will end.
Until then, I want to remain teachable, compassionate, and humble—but also unwilling to surrender truth simply because the culture has moved in another direction.
If the world is against Truth, then I am against the world.
Leave a Reply